A response

“No politics in the union”, said the anarchist.

We at WOBBLING TOWARDS COMMUNISM are both delighted and surprised by the attention we are suddenly getting. If we had known this would happen, we would have left a biting comment on the Industrial Worker facebook page long ago! We would like to address some of the recent feedback, most of which is about our aims, our output, and our conduct.

When we say communism, we mean “the real movement that abolishes the present state of things”. This present state of things is a social order predicated on value-creation through wage-labor and the circulation of that value through exchange. We are for the dissolution of class society, recognising the immediacy of communism, therefore we also oppose the state in all it’s forms. We do not seek leadership over this movement or over this union, not out of moral principle, but because we realize that it is the class itself that must take up leadership, and it is only the class in motion that is able to overcome the current social order. We are not members of any communist/socialist party or organization, we are only members of the IWW.

We call ourselves communists not because of any allegiance to Marx or any other writer who has called themselves that (although we are indebted to their analysis), but because for us, communism means the end of the commodity form and exchange being in control of our social-relations in favor of the directly human community. This is opposed to the abstract and moral formulations of other writers and thinkers who have thought of human emancipation in terms of “freedom” or “rights” or “liberty”. All of which emerged, ironically enough, out of attempts to justify the very basis of a society they claim to abhor. We do not want a better or more democratic version of this world, we want something new!

The purpose of this grouping is to try to put hard questions to ourselves and to clarify our role as a revolutionary industrial union. Our analysis is especially important considering that the IWW has no internal coherent theory, or set of texts and ideas that describe what wage-labour, commodity production, the state or class society is. These elements are notably lacking in regards to certain other political tendencies within the union, despite being perhaps the more active elements within the organization. What occurs as a result is that the IWW has been turned into just another leftist organization that involves people just endlessly going to meetings and nothing of note actually happening, despite some successes here and there at organizing a few shops. There is a disconnect between these small successes and the goal of changing the world. While we recognize the usefulness of proletarian organs we are also opposed to uncritical proletarian self-affirmation. The historic task of the proletariat is to destroy the proletariat as a category, along with every other social class.

Some wobs have responded to our stated existence in an organized format. When we hear the “no politics in the Union” line, it’s understandable where they’re coming from, but it is consistent with what many in the Union already do and will continue to do. How many times has the IWW been invoked in protests over things not related to workplace struggles? How about in defending oppressed groups? These are all political stances in which the IWW has been inserted into by well-meaning wobs. Our hearts goes out to you all for your effort but the purpose of the Union – the abolition of wage-labor – is nothing short of the most profound political change that the world has seen since the bourgeois revolutions themselves. Keep your eyes on the prize!

We could have sent our introductory statement for inclusion to the GOB, the internal-only discussion publication where little discussion happens, save for the thrill and excitement of one or two letters, voting results of the GEB, and accounting statements. We would have sent it there, if we didn’t care if anyone would read it. We made a deliberate choice to submit it for inclusion to the Industrial Worker, because we wanted it to be read by members and non-members alike.

We can see how some Fellow Workers might feel that our introductory statement runs contrary, and even abusive of the purpose of the Industrial Worker. If the Industrial Worker is meant to be a method of voicing concerns and developments within the Union, we see no reason why a group of organized wobblies should have to buy advertisement space on that periodical, especially when it is essentially a greeting for further dialogue, nor should it be obscured within the confines of union records. This dialogue will be more provoking than the announcement precisely because we are taking our time.

Now that we have your attention, we hope you stay with us as we gradually put out articles which clarify and develop our positions.

Wobble on,
WOBBLING TOWARDS COMMUNISM
wobblingtowardscommunism.wordpress.com
@IWWCommunists